Home

THE TRAGEDY

On November 21, 1992, 35 year old Tom Monfils, an employee at the James River paper mill in Green Bay, Wisconsin, left his work station and disappeared. After an intensive search, coworkers found his body the next evening submerged in a large paper pulp storage tank. One end of Tom’s own exercise jump rope was wrapped around his neck and, on the other end of this rope, a fifty pound iron weight. Many thought it was a suicide, the police called it a Union sponsored murder.

The CONVICTION of SIX INNOCENT MEN

In a single trial almost three years later, six of Monfils’ coworkers were eventually convicted of his death and given ‘life sentences’; the result of a preordained police theory, a one-sided investigation, and a reckless prosecution. In spite of repeated appeals and having one of the convictions reversed due to an absence of legitimate evidence, over twenty years later, five of the six wrongfully convicted men remain in prison to this day.

THE ISSUES

With the following questions about the investigation and the trial being of great concern;             (1) the State’s mandatory use of a six-person joint-trial; (2) an investigation that provided no evidence of guilt or innocence; (3) a lead police detective confessing to altering official police documents; (4) the use of the suspicious ‘repressed-memory-finger-pointing-alibi’ testimony at trial, of the James River employee who worked next to the location where Monfils’ body was found. (who later shot and killed his own unarmed brother); (5) the use of smalltown drunken barroom gossip testimony of one of the defendants neighbors; (6) the use of the uncorroborated jailhouse testimony of a career criminal; (7) the fact that a number of prosecution witnesses have since recanted their testimony; (8) that the Federal Court found five different Green Bay Police Officers negligent in the handling of several phone calls Monfils had made to the police just prior to his death; (9) And more importantly, the fact that one of the six convictions from the same ‘joint’ trial was later reversed due to a lack of legitimate evidence:       Justice demands a closer look at the validity of the five remaining guilty verdicts.

GREEN BAY POLICE RESPONSIBLE

“Monfils’ Family gets $2 million – Jury finds Green Bay Police responsible in 1992 death”

-Green Bay Press Gazette Saturday June 28, 1997-

Just over four and a half years after Tom Monfils’ death and almost two years after the conviction of the six innocent men, while responding to a Federal Court wrongful death style civil suit filed by Monfils’ family against the City of Green Bay and the Green Bay Police Department, a jury in Milwaukee declared the Green Bay Police responsible for the events that led up to Monfils’ death. The jury found that “the City had ratified unconstitutional behavior by [Deputy Chief] Taylor” and that “Taylor’s actions were a cause of Monfils’ injuries, as were the defendants’ [the other GBPD officers] negligence and the city’s failure to provide equal protection for anonymous tipsters.” After appeals and attorney fees the award was in excess of three million dollars.

The REVERSED CONVICTION

In a scathing decision almost six years later, in 2001, the U.S. Federal Courts exonerated one of the six defendants convicted of killing Monfils, stating “no reasonable jury” should be allowed to convict by stacking “speculation on top of inferences drawn from other inferences”.  “This…, like so much else in this case, is conjecture camouflaged as [if it were] evidence.” requiring “a leap of faith” that no ”rational jury” should be allowed to take.

OUR OBJECTIVES

This website strives to raise public awareness that five other innocent men were also convicted for this crime, a crime that may not have even happened. We are working tirelessly to right this wrong for the five men still imprisoned today.

Please join us in our fight for justice. The following web pages contain the basic information with links to events, excerpts from the book, and some of the information that was left on the cutting room floor. 

THE BOOK

The Monfils Conspiracy; The Conviction of Six Innocent Men

by Denis Gullickson and John Gaie with exoneree Mike Piaskowski

To obtain a copy of the book and learn all the information compiled in the eight year re-investigation of this case by writers Denis Gullickson and John Gaie with the help of ‘Exoneree’ Mike Piaskowski, please visit our order page or see the special pricing below.

 

***** Special Winter Is Here Sale *****

To receive autographed and personalized copies;

Just send $20.95 $15.95 for a softcover book or $30.95
$25.95 for a hardcover book, plus $3.95 ‘FREE’ shipping, along with your name, address, and any special shipping instructions to:

Writers Ink

Dept WS

1407 Mohican Court

Green Bay, WI 54313

(prices include Wisconsin sales tax)

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Along with the following informational updates we have been receiving quite a few emails with some great questions. Please don’t forget to check them and our answers out on the “EMAIL RESPONSES” link above.

Comments are closed.

X-mas Letter from Mike Hirn

A very nice Christmas card and letter was received recently from Mike Hirn. (click on link below) Please remember him, Michael Johnson, Rey Moore, Dale Basten, and Keith Kutska this Holiday Season.

Writers Ink Inc.

Denis, John and Mike

Hirn xmas letter 2012

Posted in Michael Hirn, news | Comments Off

FREE Tee-Shirts featuring the “JUSTICE DENIED” and “A GREEN BAY FUMBLE” logos

MAKE A DONATION AND GET A FREE  T-SHIRT!

A limited number of Tee-shirts and ladies T-tops are now available by making a minimum donation of $25.00 to the SIM Innocence Fund. (All proceeds will be used to help support the effort to expose this injustice to the world.)

All shirts feature a full sized “SIX INNOCENT MEN” logo on  the back and the eyecatching “A GREEN BAY FUMBLE” logo on the front.

 

Tee shirts are available in a choice of Black, White or Heather grey in sizes; Sm, Med. Lg, XL, 2XL or 3XL. Ladies T-tops are available in White and Heather grey only in sizes; Sm, Med, Lg and XL.

Please send a check or money order, including shirt style, size, and color, along with your shipping address to;

Writers Ink’s SIM Tee Shirt Promotion

1407 Mohican Court

Green Bay, WI     54313

 

Posted in news | Comments Off

Much Overdue Great News;

For all the wrong reasons, I’m sure, the Wrongful Death Civil Lawsuit that was filed against the six of us almost 20 years ago by Bruce Bachhuber’s law firm, Hanaway & Ross, on behalf of Tom Monfils’ wife and family, was finally dismissed – with prejudice and without expense. (Prejudice means that it cannot be re-filed or re-opened) Note; for unknown reasons Dale Basten isn’t named on the dismissal order, probably a typo. [Another example of their combined lack of proficiency?]

In May of 1993 the wrongful death lawsuit was filed against Keith Kutska, Randy Lepak, Reynold Moore, Michael Hirn, Dale Basten, Michael Johnson, and I, Michael Piaskowski. Later, Marlyn Charles, the Union, and several insurance companies were added to the lawsuit.

After years of delays and legal wrangling; including depositions, interrogatories, amendments, and other ways of wasting time and money; some of the named defendants ‘settled’ rather than continue to rack up undue expenses. We six wrongfully convicted men, along with Randy Lepak; were all that was left “holding the bag” for more than a decade. Several times over the years individual requests to be dismissed from the lawsuit were summarily dismissed. After I was exonerated, my request to be dismissed “in the interest of justice” was met with scorn and the threat to re-open the suit; calling my request “frivolous” and an “insult”.

Although I had the opportunity to attend the recent hearing, as it states in the court order, I preferred not to attend and instead, submitted a letter to the Court that was to be read into the record. My letter to the court follows;

************************************************************************************************

Michael Piaskowski’s Statement to be read into the record for the July 18, 2012 Hearing referencing the Civil Case Number; 93-CV-765

My name is Michael LawrencePiaskowski. I am the same Michael L. Piaskowski that is named in the Wrongful Death Civil Lawsuit case number 93-CV-765. I am the Michael L. Piaskowski that was unfairly convicted in 1995 of being Party to the Crime of First Degree Intentional Homicide in the 1992 death of Thomas J. Monfils (95 CF 239): The same Michael L. Piaskowski that was later exonerated of this crime five and a half years later by the United States District Court – Eastern District of Wisconsin (99 C 1428), upheld on appeal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (01-1159). See; Piaskowski vs. Bett, 256 F.3d 687(Seventh Circuit 2001).

I wish to make the following statements for the court record of 93-CV-765;

My Great Grandparents, Joseph and Dorothy Piaskowski, came to Wisconsin from Poland in 1891. After a short stay in South Milwaukee they moved their family to the 600 block of Main Street here in Green Bay where they owned and operated several small businesses over the years. The original building still stands today (618 Main St) and is one of the oldest buildings in downtown Green Bay. The Piaskowski family has resided in and around the Green Bay area for over one-hundred and twenty-one (121) productive years. Our family has a long, storied, and proud history of being high quality, honest, law abiding, blue-collar working, United States citizens; always willing to step up and do the right thing. I (Michael L. Piaskowski) am no exception.

Sixty-three years ago I was born to Francis and Cleo (Kramer) Piaskowski. I attended several different catholic and public schools before graduating from Green Bay West High School in 1967. I had a Press Gazette paper route and worked part-time at St Vincent’s Hospital after school. After graduation I worked at Auto Glass Specialists and on the Chicago and North West Railroad section crew before enlisting into the United States Army in late 1968. I was honorably discharged in December of 1971. I am a Vietnam Veteran.

In early 1971 I married my high school sweetheart, the former Margie Kraning. On August 28, 1971 our beautiful daughter Jennifer was born. In 1972 Margie and I bought six acres of land on White Pine Road in the town of Suamico where we built a home later that summer. In February 1972 I began my paper making career at the American Can Company’s paper mill on Day Street (eventually James River), now Georgia Pacific East. I worked in the Third Floor Converting Department for approximately one year before transferring to the Paper Machine Department. For the next twenty plus years I worked my way up from the spare-hand position up to the top job on the paper machines as the Paper Mill Specialist; including a stint as a fill-in foreman and a year as the Hourly Facilitator for the Quality of Work Life Program (a joint company/union venture). We were living the American dream.  I had no criminal record and considered myself an above average employee and citizen, in fact, I still do.

Having stated the above as a base, I will get to the point.

As we all know, in November of 1992 Tom Monfils went missing and was later found deceased.  I think we all know what the accusations against the six of us were, and what the results of the trial were, but what most do not know, or what some people do not want to hear or recognize, is the truth.

The truth is that these six convictions were so wrong that they are most likely the largest unrecognized man-made miscarriage of justice in Wisconsin’s history –maybe in the entire United States of America.

I won’t rehash the details but I will say this; other than Tom Monfils’ death, the very worst part of this tragedy is that we, (Michael Hirn, Michael Johnson, Rey Moore, Keith Kutska, Dale Basten and I) were all convicted of something that never happened: Yes, you heard me right, it never happened.

Now that’s not to say that Tom’s death didn’t happen; Tragically Tom is, in fact, dead. What I am saying is this; the very thing that we were convicted of doing—did not happen. The so-called ‘bubbler confrontation’; where the six of us were supposed to have assaulted Tom and then carried his beaten and unconscious body off  to a paper pulp storage tank to be disposed of: That’s what NEVER HAPPENED… I as there that day. I was the lead man on the job. I was responsible for the paper machines production and operation. If any kind of a physical assault on Tom would have taken place I would have seen it or heard about it. Nothing like that happened — not with my knowledge, not without my knowledge – not with me present, not without me present. There is a reason why the investigators never found any physical evidence of an assault anywhere around my area of responsibility; nothing happened there. Whatever it was that happened to Tom, HAD to have happened to him someplace else in some other way. Tom’s body was found two buildings away. First the investigators got it wrong, then the prosecutors got it wrong, and then the jury got it wrong.

This brings me to the wrongful death lawsuit that this hearing is about; For almost twenty years this ill-advised lawsuit has been causing stress to all of the named defendants and their families, while doing absolutely nothing to help seek justice for Tom. The only thing this lawsuit has done was to help promote the unbelievable injustice that Tom’s death has turned into. It was unfair, it was premature, and it was a complete mistake from the very beginning. The courts never should have allowed it to exist for a minute, much less for all these years. From a personal standpoint it has also kept me, an exonerated and innocent citizen, from exercising my Constitutional Right to pursue the American Dream unencumbered.

Obviously we all want to have this part of this major injustice over-with in order to end the stress and suffering. So for that reason, and that reason alone, I do not contest the long overdue dismissal of this irrational lawsuit with prejudice and without costs to any of the named defendants only.

Respectfully Submitted,

Michael L. Piaskowski

 

 

 

Posted in Featured Excerpts, news | Comments Off

A Ringing Endorsement

Hi All,
A quick note to let everyone know that we, (our efforts), received a much appreciated “vote of confidence” from a very prominent and well respected citizen from the Brown County legal community recently.
Thanks to a couple of good friends of Cal Monfils’, Pat and Bill Larsen, Cal and I had the opportunity to meet with and discuss the case with retired Brown County Judge William J. Duffy (1968-1992) last week. It seems that the now ninety-five year old Judge Duffy has been bothered for some time about the way the GBPD and the Brown County District Attorney’s office handled the Monfils case, even to the point of losing sleep over it when it comes up in the news these days. Judge Duffy and the Larsen’s had many discerning questions about some of the obvious and some of the not-so-obvious details of the case; and they hadn’t even read the book yet. We gave each a complimentary copy of the book with the hopes that we will be able to have further discussions with them in the future.
More information will be provided when it becomes available.
MikePie and Cal

Posted in news, Uncategorized | Comments Off

Book Review

The attached link is an honest and factual analysis of The Monfils Conspiracy book by Bert Monsen. Bert is a 44 year (and still counting) law enforcement veteran with training and experience in everything from evidence technician, to detective, to division commander, to department administrator, including cold case homicide reviews.

Click here;

Book – Bert Monsen’s book review

For questions and comments please feel free to contact us via the Contact Us link on the website.

 

Posted in Media, news | Comments Off

The Joint Trial – Fair or Unfair

 

The most often asked question I receive usually has to do with the “joint trial” issue. Why did we let the State try all six of us together in one trial?

The simple answer is; “We didn’t”. We knew the devastating affect that a joint trial would have on our Constitutional Rights to a fair trial and requested ‘Severance’ at every conceivable opportunity. The Brown County District Attorney is the one that successfully demanded a ‘joint trial’ by convincing the trial judge that justice could be obtained in spite of the serious  pitfalls of trying six individual defendants together in a single trial with one jury.

A fair trial by jury is the most important fundamental principle in our legal protection. The right of every individual to have their character judged by one’s peers serves as an important check on the government’s ability to deprive us of our freedom and liberty. In a nutshell; by its very design and purpose, a jury trial is intended to limit the overwhelming power that the police, prosecutors, and judges have to incarcerate.

But just as important as understanding what a fair jury trial is, however, is to understand what a fair jury trial is not.

A fair jury trial is not a single trial where multiple defendants are tried as one. A fair jury trial is not a fair trial when codefendants are unfairly exposed to the State’s allegations toward others. A fair jury trial is not a fair trial when the government is allowed to try individual citizens together in the interest of saving time and money. Simply put, a ‘joint’ trial is not a fair trial.

Trials with multiple defendants may have a certain validity in lessor crimes, but when the accusations are as serious and the punishment as severe as they were in the Monfils case, the joint trial should have never been allowed.

The right to a fair trial is the very essence of the American way, meant to be unbiased and rational —not meant to be used as a ploy in a deadly game of investigative brinksmanship; And definately not meant to be used by the Green Bay Police Investigators and Brown County District Attorney as a way to protect themselves from their own mistakes.

Allowing the State to manipulate the reasoning for any trial to increase the government’s control over any potentially innocent person should be a crime: In the Monfils case, accepting the DA’s reasoning for a joint trial was a crime. Letting them get away with it is one too.

Deference to a jury verdict is not a substitute for meaningful judicial review.

It was the government prosecutors that demanded the joint trial. It was the only way they could inact their hidden agenda of allowing unreliable hearsay and worse, double hearsay (the Brian Kellner “he said, that she said, that they said” testimony), to be introduced into a United States’ Court of Law.

Mike “Pie Piaskowski

Posted in news, Uncategorized | Comments Off

E-Books NOW AVAILABLE

GREAT NEWS!!!

The E-BOOK version of our book, THE MONFILS CONSPIRACY: The Conviction of Six Innocent Men, is now available for Kindle and other e-book readers at www.amazon.com for $9.99.

For hard and soft cover copy books please see our order a book link for special holiday pricing.

Posted in Events, Media, news | Comments Off

Parole Letters

Mike Hirn and Rey Moore have parole hearings soon. We are starting a letter writing campaign to the parole board to show community support for their release. Letters to the board for Mike Hirn needs to go out as soon as possible. Letters for Rey Moore need to be in by December 10th. Please send the letters to:

Early Release Review Commission
3099 E. Washington Ave.
PO Box 7960
Madison, WI 53707-7960

 

Letters to the commission can be as simple as;

Dear Commission Members,

My name is _________(Insert full name)________.  I am submitting this letter on behalf of Mr. _____________________.

I would like to go on record as being in favor of an early parole.

Thank-You,

Signed (Full name and contact info here)

 

(You could also add some personal thoughts or something like this if you want;)

 

_________ was a hardworking and stable member of the community that still has our continued support. I firmly believe there is nothing to be gained by his further confinement.

Posted in Blog, Events, news | Tagged , , | Comments Off