Home

THE TRAGEDY

On November 21, 1992, 35 year old Tom Monfils, an employee at the James River paper mill in Green Bay, Wisconsin, left his work station and disappeared. After an intensive search, coworkers found his body the next evening submerged in a large paper pulp storage tank. One end of Tom’s own exercise jump rope was wrapped around his neck and, on the other end of this rope, a fifty pound iron weight. Many thought it was a suicide, the police called it a Union sponsored murder.

The CONVICTION of SIX INNOCENT MEN

In a single trial almost three years later, six of Monfils’ coworkers were eventually convicted of his death and given ‘life sentences’; the result of a preordained police theory, a one-sided investigation, and a reckless prosecution. In spite of repeated appeals and having one of the convictions reversed due to an absence of legitimate evidence, almost nineteen years later, five of the six wrongfully convicted men remain in prison to this day.

THE ISSUES

With the following questions about the investigation and the trial being of great concern;             (1) the State’s mandatory use of a six-person joint-trial; (2) an investigation that provided no evidence of guilt or innocence; (3) a lead police detective confessing to altering official police documents about the investigation; (4) the use of the suspicious ‘repressed-memory-finger-pointing-alibi’ testimony at trial, of the James River employee who worked next to the location where Monfils’ body was found. (who later shot and killed his own unarmed brother); (5) the use of smalltown drunken barroom gossip testimony of one of the defendants neighbors; (6) the use of the uncorroborated jailhouse testimony of a career criminal; (7) the fact that a number of prosecution witnesses have since recanted their testimony; (8) that the Federal Court found five different Green Bay Police Officers negligent in the handling of several phone calls Monfils had made to the police just prior to his death; (9) And more importantly, the fact that one of the six convictions from the same ‘joint’ trial was later reversed due to a lack of legitimate evidence:       Justice demands a closer look at the validity of all six of these guilty verdicts.

GREEN BAY POLICE RESPONSIBLE

“Monfils’ Family gets $2 million – Jury finds Green Bay Police responsible in 1992 death”

-Green Bay Press Gazette Saturday June 28, 1997-

Just over four and a half years after Tom Monfils’ death and almost two years after the conviction of the six innocent men, while responding to a Federal Court wrongful death style civil suit filed by Monfils’ family against the City of Green Bay and the Green Bay Police Department, a jury in Milwaukee declared the Green Bay Police responsible for the events that led up to Monfils’ death. The jury found that “the City had ratified unconstitutional behavior by [Deputy Chief] Taylor” and that “Taylor’s actions were a cause of Monfils’ injuries, as were the defendants’ [the other GBPD officers] negligence and the city’s failure to provide equal protection for anonymous tipsters.” After appeals and attorney fees the award was in excess of three million dollars.

The REVERSED CONVICTION

In a scathing decision almost six years later, in 2001, the U.S. Federal Courts exonerated one of the six defendants convicted of killing Monfils, stating “no reasonable jury” should be allowed to convict by stacking “speculation on top of inferences drawn from other inferences”.  “This…, like so much else in this case, is conjecture camouflaged as [if it were] evidence.” requiring “a leap of faith” that no ”rational jury” should be allowed to take.

OUR OBJECTIVES

This website strives to raise public awareness that five other innocent men were also convicted for this crime, a crime that may not have even happened. We are working tirelessly to right this wrong for the five men still imprisoned today.

Please join us in our fight for justice. The following web pages contain the basic information with links to events, excerpts from the book and some that were left on the cutting room floor. 

THE BOOK

The Monfils Conspiracy; The Conviction of Six Innocent Men

by Denis Gullickson and John Gaie with exoneree Mike Piaskowski

To obtain a copy of the book and learn all the information compiled in the eight year re-investigation of this case by writers Denis Gullickson and John Gaie with the help of ‘Exoneree’ Mike Piaskowski, please visit our order page or see the special pricing below.

 

***** Special SPRING IS HERE Sale *****

To receive autographed and personalized copies;

Just send $20.95 $15.95 for a softcover book or $30.95
$25.95 for a hardcover book, plus $3.95 ‘FREE’ shipping, along with your name, address, and any special shipping instructions to:

Writers Ink

Dept SPG

1407 Mohican Court

Green Bay, WI 54313

(prices include Wisconsin sales tax)

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Along with the following informational updates we have been receiving quite a few emails with some great questions. Please don’t forget to check them and our answers out on the “EMAIL RESPONSES” link above.

Comments are closed.

Request for a Short Synopsis

FYI,

While at the Innocence Network Conference in Kansas City a few weeks ago I attended a very informative presentation about the Amanda Knox case. The presenter was Boise State University Biology Professor Greg Hamplikian PhD, DNA expert, and Director of the Idaho Innocence Project. (see his bio at; http://biology.boisestate.edu/faculty-and-staff/faculty/greg-hampikian/ ).

I had met Greg several years ago at the 2006 Innocence Conference in Seattle. Two years ago I gave Greg one of our books and have discussed the SIM case with him several times over the years. After his presentation this year I gave him an update about some of the things that have been happening lately . Greg has always shown an interest in our case and with sharing it with others, so when he suggested that I put together a one page synopsis without worrying to much about specifics or trying to cover everything (just enough information to help people understand and hopefully spark some interest) I put together the following and snail mailed it to him today;

MikePie

*   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

A GREEN BAY FUMBLE   –  THE CONVICTION OF SIX INNOCENT MEN

Green Bay, Wisconsin:

In 1995, six innocent men were convicted of a homicide they did not commit. (A death that may have been a suicide) All six of the innocent men received ‘life sentences’. After appeal, one of the wrongly convicted men was completely exonerated and set free due to a lack of legitimate evidence; the other five innocent men remain in prison, victims of this continuing injustice.

—After finding a missing coworker in a large paper pulp storage vat with a 50# weight tied to his neck with his own jump-rope, the police, as evidenced by their lack of investigation, must have assumed it was a suicide. Later, when they discovered that they had ignored several of the deceased man’s phone call pleas for help in the days prior (A turn of events that must have made the police realize they were solely responsible for his death if it were a suicide), they decided it had to be a homicide, and then created a theory that blamed his coworkers and got them off the hook. (Years later the deceased man’s family won a 3.1 million dollar civil lawsuit against the cops for their incompetence)

With botching the first several days of the investigation because of their suicide assumption and now with a murder theory as the only focus, for two plus years the investigation came up with zilch; no weapons, no witnesses, no confessions, no nothing. And because of their lack of forethought and without a proper investigative policy; they found no blood, no hair, no tissue, no nothing, not even a single usable DNA particle. But that didn’t deter them. With the help of a particular rogue detective (who admitted at trial to manipulating police records and badgering witnesses); and by accepting vague information that supported their theory and ignoring quality evidence that didn’t; and by claiming that a ‘union conspiracy of silence’ was to blame for an imaginary lack of employee cooperation, they literally custom built (without any physical evidence) a circumstantial murder scene scenario to fit their theory (a scenario that I guarantee you never happened). They did this by using the ‘repressed memory finger pointing alibi’ of a coworker who worked basically alone in the secluded area where the deceased was found (a ‘should be suspect’ who also shot and killed his own unarmed brother a year later), the jailhouse testimony of a career criminal (who stabbed his wife to death after getting an obvious break for his testimony at our trial), a neighbor’s double hearsay testimony about some drunken barroom role-play gossip (which also never happened – another creation of the rogue detective), and the illusionary testimony about mill procedure from several supposedly expert, but completely unqualified, mill workers. The Brown County District Attorney took all of this and more and sold it to a sequestered and confused and ‘in-a-hurry’ out of town jury during a forced 29-day joint-trial that included one judge, one jury, and six different defendants.

The six defendants had little to nothing in common. Five white men and one black man. They were all above average blue collar workers who barely knew each other, some not at all: each with clean criminal records (save one).  Different men of different ages with different friends and different hobbies: Family men with different likes and different dislikes, living in different communities: They had different jobs in different departments, belonging to two different unions. Absolutely no associations with each other at all.

Besides their obvious innocence, what is especially telling is that all six of these courageous upstanding citizens continue to assert their 100% innocence over 19 years later.

Please help us help them. Thank-You

Posted in news | Comments Off

Book Review

The attached link is an honest and factual analysis of The Monfils Conspiracy book by Bert Monsen. Bert is a 44 year (and still counting) law enforcement veteran with training and experience in everything from evidence technician, to detective, to division commander, to department administrator, including cold case homicide reviews.

Click here;

Book – Bert Monsen’s book review

For questions and comments please feel free to contact us via the Contact Us link on the website.

 

Posted in Media, news | Comments Off

THE INJUSTICE CONTINUES

Written by Scott Cooper Williams – Green Bay Press-Gazette   3-14-12

Reynold Moore, one of six men convicted in the 1992 murder of Green Bay paper mill co-worker Tom Monfils, was denied parole today for the third time.

The state Parole Commission offered no explanation for the action, but agreed to give Moore another parole review in 12 months. A spokesman said the commission could have scheduled Moore’s next review several years away. He was similarly denied parole in March 2010 and February 2011.

Moore, 65, currently in the Oshkosh Correctional Institution, was sentenced to life in prison following his conviction in 1995. Also still in prison are co-defendants Keith Kutska, Dale Basten, Michael Johnson and Michael Hirn.

The sixth defendant, Michael Piaskowski, was freed in 2001 after a federal court overturned his conviction.

Prosecutors argue that the men attacked Monfils because he told police that Kutska planned to steal a coil of wire from their workplace, then known as the James River Corp. paper mill. Monfils, 35, was beaten and dumped in a paper pulp vat, where his body was found the next day with a weight tied around the neck.

The case remains a source of controversy in the Green Bay area, where supporters of the six men contend that they were wrongly convicted.

Johnson and Hirn have been denied parole in the past, while Basten is first eligible later this year and Kutska is eligible in 2015.

swilliams@greenbaypressgazette.com

*********************************************************

New trial denied for Rey Moore

Attorney for Moore says he’s disappointed, is considering another appeal

9:55 AM, Jan. 26, 2012 |

MADISON — A Wisconsin appeals court has denied the request for a new trial made by a man convicted of killing a Green Bay paper mill worker in 1992.

Rey Moore was one of six men convicted of killing their co-worker Tom Monfils. His body was found in a pulp vat at a Green Bay paper mill.

Moore’s attorney Byron Lichstein [from the University of Wisconsin Innocence Project] argued that the conviction should be overturned because of questionable testimony by a prison inmate who recanted his testimony that Moore participated in beating Monfils.

But the 3rd District Court of Appeals on Thursday agreed with the lower court that it was unlikely a jury would overturn its conviction based on the new evidence.

Lichstein says he’s disappointed in the ruling and considering an appeal.

Posted in Media, news, Reynold Moore | Comments Off

The Joint Trial – Fair or Unfair

 

The most often asked question I receive usually has to do with the “joint trial” issue. Why did we let the State try all six of us together in one trial?

The simple answer is; “We didn’t”. We knew the devastating affect that a joint trial would have on our Constitutional Rights to a fair trial and requested ‘Severance’ at every conceivable opportunity. The Brown County District Attorney is the one that successfully demanded a ‘joint trial’ by convincing the trial judge that justice could be obtained in spite of the serious  pitfalls of trying six individual defendants together in a single trial with one jury.

A fair trial by jury is the most important fundamental principle in our legal protection. The right of every individual to have their character judged by one’s peers serves as an important check on the government’s ability to deprive us of our freedom and liberty. In a nutshell; by its very design and purpose, a jury trial is intended to limit the overwhelming power that the police, prosecutors, and judges have to incarcerate.

But just as important as understanding what a fair jury trial is, however, is to understand what a fair jury trial is not.

A fair jury trial is not a single trial where multiple defendants are tried as one. A fair jury trial is not a fair trial when codefendants are unfairly exposed to the State’s allegations toward others. A fair jury trial is not a fair trial when the government is allowed to try individual citizens together in the interest of saving time and money. Simply put, a ‘joint’ trial is not a fair trial.

Trials with multiple defendants may have a certain validity in lessor crimes, but when the accusations are as serious and the punishment as severe as they were in the Monfils case, the joint trial should have never been allowed.

The right to a fair trial is the very essence of the American way, meant to be unbiased and rational —not meant to be used as a ploy in a deadly game of investigative brinksmanship; And definately not meant to be used by the Green Bay Police Investigators and Brown County District Attorney as a way to protect themselves from their own mistakes.

Allowing the State to manipulate the reasoning for any trial to increase the government’s control over any potentially innocent person should be a crime: In the Monfils case, accepting the DA’s reasoning for a joint trial was a crime. Letting them get away with it is one too.

Deference to a jury verdict is not a substitute for meaningful judicial review.

It was the government prosecutors that demanded the joint trial. It was the only way they could inact their hidden agenda of allowing unreliable hearsay and worse, double hearsay (the Brian Kellner “he said, that she said, that they said” testimony), to be introduced into a United States’ Court of Law.

Mike “Pie Piaskowski

Posted in news, Uncategorized | Comments Off

GOOD NEWS or BAD NEWS – You Decide

THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY THAT PROSECUTED THE SIX INNOCENT MEN IN THIS CASE HAS BEEN APPOINTED TO BE A JUDGE.

DA Zakowski named Brown County Circuit Court judge

3:23 PM, Dec. 21, 2011  |
Written by
Paul Srubas
Green Bay Press-Gazette

John Zakowski, who served as Brown County district attorney for the last 24 years, has been named the newest Brown County Circuit Court judge. Gov. Scott Walker made the announcement today.

Zakowski will fill the term vacated by J.D. McKay, who retired this month from the bench of Branch VI. To retain the seat, Zakowski will have to run for election in April.

The governor’s selection team picked Zakowski over Tammy Jo Hock, who serves locally as assistant U.S. Attorney.

Once Zakowski assumes his office, the governor’s office will begin accepting applications to fill the district attorney seat. After the application period is closed, interviews and background checks will be conducted, after which the governor will appoint a successor.

Zakowski, a 1983 graduate of the University of Wisconsin Law School, was appointed district attorney in 1987 by then-Gov. Tommy Thompson, to fill the position vacated by the late Peter Naze, who had assumed a judge’s position that spring.

Prior to taking office in August 1987, Zakowski was with the Nelson & Schmeling law firm.

He was a 1975 honors graduate of Green Bay Southwest High School.

psrubas@greenbaypressgazette.com and follow him on Twitter@PGpaulsrubas.

Posted in Media, news, Uncategorized | Comments Off

E-Books NOW AVAILABLE

GREAT NEWS!!!

The E-BOOK version of our book, THE MONFILS CONSPIRACY: The Conviction of Six Innocent Men, is now available for Kindle and other e-book readers at www.amazon.com for $9.99.

For hard and soft cover copy books please see our order a book link for special holiday pricing.

Posted in Events, Media, news | Comments Off

The SCENE newspaper article

 

Hi All,

This is MikePie. After doing an interview with Tom Monfils’ brother Cal Monfils and with me, Denis Gullickson (main author of The Monfils Conspiracy book) wrote a very interesting two part article for the ‘Take On Titletown’ series that he has been doing for the SCENE NEWSPAPER here in Northeast Wisconsin. The article is titled “Finding Common Ground in Green Bay’s Most Notorious Murder Case”. The first part is in the October issue with part two following in the November issue.

The ‘SCENE’ is a local monthly news, arts, and entertainment newspaper available at most stores, gas stations, restaurants and other publication distribution points everywhere. It is also available online at www.scenenewspaper.com

Below is an online link to the October article:

http://greenbay.scenenewspaper.com/news-views/19-news-views/815-a-take-on-titletown-finding-common-ground-in-green-bays-most-notorious-murder-case.html

Below is the online link to the November article:

http://greenbay.scenenewspaper.com/news-views/19-news-views/835-a-take-on-titletown-finding-common-ground-in-green-bays-most-notorious-murder-case-part-2.html

 

Posted in Media, news, Uncategorized | Comments Off

Walk for Truth and Justice in Review

Friday, October 28, 2011 – The Second Annual Walk for Truth and Justice held in support of the six innocent men that were wrongly convicted in the death of Tom Monfils, was a huge success.

On the sixteenth anniversary of the errant verdicts over sixty people rallied at the Brown County Courthouse in downtown Green Bay, carrying signs and lighted candles while chanting “Truth and Justice now” and “Not guilty, Not guilty” after each of the men’s names were called out.

At the beginning of the walk the crowd was addressed by several featured speakers; Author Denis Gullickson, activists Joan Treppa and Clare Martinson, University of Wisconsin Innocence Project Director Byron Lichstein, retired correctional officer Tom Krueger, and Barbara McKinney, Associate Director Madison Area Urban Ministry.

The Brown County District Attorney, who was also invited to address the rally but declined to respond, had this to say about the event to ABC TV2 reporter Taky Ono:

“…District Attorney John Zakowski, who prosecuted the so-called “Monfils Six” says these protesters are biased when judging the evidence.

He criticizes the controversial book they use to support their case, called [The] Monfils Conspiracy.

Instead of reading a book, I would just say, if anyone had the time, read the transcript, read the entire trial, view the entire trial, and then use your common sense. It is the only logical conclusion,” the prosecutor said. “Going in with an open mind, you will come to the only conclusion that these were the people who put Thomas Monfils in that vat.”

Supporters of the innocent men also urged the public to read the transcript of the case, but [read it] while contracting it with the book.

Denis Gullickson, co-author of  The Monfils Conspiracy, said, “I invite people in the community to spend time doing their homework and getting familiar with this case. Often time [opinions are] based on real scant knowledge of the case.”

D.A. Zakowski, though, claims the evidence is so obviously against the men, he still can’t believe Piaskowski got out.

“We’re as convinced now as we were 16 years ago that we made the right decision. [The jury] made the only decision. That was based upon the evidence,” he said.

 

Our Response to the DA’s illogical logic:

“I think the district attorney’s ‘common sense’ and logic are a bit skewed”, said Mike Pie. Transcripts have nothing to do with the accuracy of the facts. We are innocent men who were found guilty because of a flawed investigation, not because the words of the trial proceedings were written down right; transcripts do nothing more than memorialize a case that the prosecution presents, including the flawed ones. This investigation provided nothing more than a profound abscence of legitimate evidence for the trial.

While the District Attorney may want to advise everyone, “Instead of reading the book…”read the [trial] transcript”, we respectfully disagree; Anyone taking the time to read through a 28-day-trial consisting of over six thousand seven hundred pages of transcripts, will only end up being just as confused as the jury was. The jury’s confusion is evidenced by one of the jury members when they said, “for at least the first two weeks of the trial they found it impossible to distinguish the six defendants from one another”. Then, while reflecting on the confusion of all multiple defendant trials, went on to say, “It is too much to process and too easy to just make the same decision for [all] of the defendants”, rather than keep separate the facts about each of them.

To understand how flawed the investigation was, we suggest you read the book first. Then, to see for yourself how this particular investigation affected the accuracy of the facts in this particular trial, read the trial transcript.

 

SPECIAL NOTE: At the Walk for Truth and Justice, the Families and Friends of the Six Innocent Men group (FAF) announced a new location for making donations to help pay for private investigation and promotional work on behalf of the Six Innocent Men. All cash, checks and money orders can be deposited at any Bank Mutual Bank branch location, made payable to Family and Friends of the Six Innocent Men. Thank-You

 

Posted in Events, Media, news | Comments Off

Parole Letters

Mike Hirn and Rey Moore have parole hearings soon. We are starting a letter writing campaign to the parole board to show community support for their release. Letters to the board for Mike Hirn needs to go out as soon as possible. Letters for Rey Moore need to be in by December 10th. Please send the letters to:

Early Release Review Commission
3099 E. Washington Ave.
PO Box 7960
Madison, WI 53707-7960

 

Letters to the commission can be as simple as;

Dear Commission Members,

My name is _________(Insert full name)________.  I am submitting this letter on behalf of Mr. _____________________.

I would like to go on record as being in favor of an early parole.

Thank-You,

Signed (Full name and contact info here)

 

(You could also add some personal thoughts or something like this if you want;)

 

_________ was a hardworking and stable member of the community that still has our continued support. I firmly believe there is nothing to be gained by his further confinement.

Posted in Blog, Events, news | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Mad As HELL !

Video of co-author John Gaie expressing his Mad as hell opinion to Adam Klugman during Adam’s “Mad As Hell in America” campaign at the FBF.

Posted in Events, Media, news | Comments Off